66° F

Reality Check: How Bad Were Those Campaign TV Ads?

Published On: Nov 13 2006 06:58:29 AM CST   Updated On: Nov 13 2006 07:29:25 AM CST

No doubt, you're glad watching TV is back to normal now that political election commercials are off the air.

VIDEO: Watch The Report

But, "Reality Check" examined the 2006 ads one last time and found the ads generally leave out important facts and stretch the truth regularly.

In total, WISC-TV analyzed 16 commercials, including 65 claims. "Reality Check" examined Gov. Jim Doyle's ads, challenger Mark Green's ads, commercials from the attorney general candidates and ads about the marriage amendment.

More than half the claims made -- 54 percent -- were rated by WISC-TV as "needs clarification."

Most of the time, it's because the claim is out of context. The ads tend to leave out facts that give a clearer picture. A good example is the Green ad featuring former Gov. and U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson.

In the heavily-played ad, Thompson said, "Mark supports stem-cell research; Don't let anyone tell you different."

Notice Thompson said that Green supports stem-cell research. He didn't say embryonic stem cell research -- leaving out that one word makes a big difference in the meaning.

But 18 percent of the claims in the ads that WISC-TV reviewed went further -- they were misleading. An example is a primary election ad from outgoing Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager.

At the end of the Lautenschlager ad, the announcer says, "And (Falk's) taken thousands from special interests like Big Oil brokers for her campaign."

On the screen, Lautenschlager's ad showed what looked like donations from companies to Kathleen Falk's campaign, but in fact, that's illegal in Wisconsin. They were actually from people who worked for those companies and only one has to do with "Big Oil" and another contribution was even returned. Lautenschlager later changed the ad.

So, how much of it was true?

Only about 26 percent of all the claims made in the ads were reviewed were labeled as true.

However, it's worth noting, there is a level of subjectivity in what is labeled "true," "misleading" or "needs clarification." Also, WISC-TV tends to review ads that need to be analyzed so those ads are naturally a bit more factually questionable.

  • Bill-Cosby-pre-trial-hearing

    Matt Rourke-Pool/Getty Images

    Cosby sex scandal timeline

    A Pennsylvania judge ruled Tuesday, May 24, there is enough evidence, for Bill Cosby to go to trial for a 2004 case. Cosby goes to trial for felony indecent assault charges and faces up to 10 years in prison. Check out a timeline of rape and other sexual misconduct accusations made against the comedian.

  • Edward Nero1

    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    Officers charged in Freddie Gray case

    Baltimore Police Officer Edward Nero was found not guilty of all charges Monday, May 23, in connection with the death of Freddie Gray, Judge Barry Williams ruled after a bench trial. Nero is one of six officers tried in connection in the case and the second to be tried. Here is a closer look at the cases of six officers charged in Gray's death.

  • PHOTOS: Birds, birds, birds!

    Birdwatchers spotted a variety of the feathered critters on a hike in Lake Mills Saturday morning. Ed Hahn, education co-chair for the Wisconsin Society for Ornithology said some were common backyard birds and others were rare sights.